Skip navigation
Twitter   Follow us  •   Share   Share    Become a member
0

Can wireless technology help the planet’s environment? A new report by BSR and commissioned by CTIA- the Wireless Association, explores the impact of wireless technology on the environment in the United States.


 

Wireless technology is about delivering information where geographic or other barriers are no longer of concern. The “information anywhere” helps benefit the environment in a number of ways.  Here are a few examples taken from the report and reported in a blog by Vijay Kanal, the Director of Information and Communications Technology Practice, Advisory Services for BSR. BSR works with its global network of more than 250 member companies to develop sustainable business strategies and solutions through consulting, research and cross-sector collaboration.

 

One of the examples from the report discusses the transportation industry, which according to Kanal is responsible for more than 40% of carbon emissions.  Wireless technology applied to just one application, fleet management, has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by 36 million metric tons—the equivalent of removing 6 million passenger vehicles from the road.  By monitoring vehicle performance, for example, fleet managers can ensure that vehicles receive needed maintenance to keep them running efficiently, and reduce fuel used per mile traveled.

 

Closer to home, wireless systems can connect appliances and devices to smart meters at homes and businesses to give homeowners and corporations better information and tools to help them make better choices and reduce energy consumption.  Smart grids, have the potential to reduce carbon emissions by 360 million metric tons if fully adopted.  Software providers are developing new tools for this purpose.  CA Technologies, for example, offers CA ecoSoftware for businesses to monitor energy usage.

 

Soil monitoring resources:

Mesa

Issacs and Associates

Holman Industries

 

Farmers can also benefit from wireless. Within the agriculture sector, soil-monitoring sensors are providing valuable information that helps farmers control the amount of water, fertilizer, and pesticides that they use, thereby saving valuable resources and minimizing the harmful effects of chemicals.  For example, one of the biggest challenges facing farmers is getting the right amount of water to the right crops at the right time.  This is still largely done by educated guesswork based on farmers giving a visual assessment of the crop’s condition and the feel of the soil.  Farms can now use wireless monitoring devices positioned in the soil that will accurately provide data about real-time soil conditions giving the farmer information about soil moisture, fertility, compaction, salinity, humidity and soil water tension as often as every ten seconds.  This would eliminate over watering or under watering.

 

According to Kanal, in early 2012, BSR will deliver the second report in this two-part series. The second report will cover the socioeconomic impacts of wireless technology around the world.


 

Tell us your thoughts.  How is your company using wireless technology to benefit the environment?

0

The race to have the most efficient data center

Companies love being called out for awards like “Best place to work” and “Leading Innovator.” However, the new “in Vogue” title might be “most efficient data center.” 

With Google’s disclosure to the public of how much energy it uses, it seems that there could be a contest brewing.  Google is believed to be the first major tech company to publicly reveal its electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.  James Glanz, a writer for the NY Times covered this announcement in a recent article.  According to Glanz, Google used approximately 260 million watts last year, enough to power 200,000 homes.

 

Despite this daunting figure, Google explains that people conduct over a billion searches a day and other downloads.  So the typical user amount is small, around 180 watt-hours a month, the equivalent of running a 60-watt light bulb for three hours per month.   The company asserts that it makes the world a greener place because it enables people to search the Internet rather than, say, drive to a library and generate emissions.

 

Google purchases carbon offsets for its emissions and has been "carbon neutral" since 2007. It says 25 percent of its electricity came from renewable sources in 2010, a figure expected to rise to 30 percent in 2011 and 35 percent in 2012 according to Dana Hull from the Mercury News.  Hull writes that tech companies in Silicon Valley and elsewhere are under enormous pressure to reduce the environmental impact of their data centers and operations as more computing services -- from email to video streaming -- move to remote servers in "the cloud" and as consumers increasingly rely on mobile phones and tablets.

The industry feeling is that Google’s announcement will most likely spur further competition in an industry where every company is striving to appear “greener” than the next, according to Dennis Symanski, a senior data center project manager at the Electric Power Research Institute, a nonprofit organization.

Implementing  greener IT is a win for companies including, good PR, more efficiency -- which often equals cost savings and various other benefits.  However, will it matter to the consumer?  Will we stop using companies that offer search engines that are powered by “less green” data centers than the competition.  Do people even connect an internet search with power usage?  Before reading this article, I did not even think about that.  How about you?  Is your company entering the competition?   Please comment.

0

When both Microsoft and Google separately announced plans to discontinue their power-monitoring devices for consumers in June, there wasn’t much push-back from either the press or the public. The motive of each company apparently was financial; profits were less than expected. In a corporate blog, Microsoft cited slow overall market adoption of the service. For its part, Google’s Green Energy Czar, Bill Weihl, wrote something similar on the Google blog , saying that the PowerMeter hadn’t scaled as quickly as the company would have liked.

 

This doesn’t mean that either company’s efforts were misguided. Far from it. I believe they were just ahead of the curve. As consumers become unhappier with rising energy bills and power interruption, they will come around.

 

Terrence Clark, Senior VP and General Manager of CA ecoSoftware products at CA Technologies, says it’s all about the pain point. Consumers today don’t believe that installing these meters will save them enough money, he says, while businesses realize that saving even 10 percent on energy costs, given the scale, makes better energy monitoring and management well worth the investment. He also notes that some businesses, including those that run large data centers and retail establishments, are especially good candidates for doing this.

 

 

A Growing Commercial Market

All of this means that business is booming for commercial use of software-based products that collect data on energy usage throughout the organization and then break it down into various metrics. Verdantix, a New York-based independent analyst firm, predicts that the market for such software will grow at more than 40 percent through 2014. The U.S. market alone will more than double; from $207 million in 2011 to $558 million in 2014. The industries with the greatest adoption rates will be oil and gas, telecommunications, utilities, technology and retail, Verdantix says.

 

The reason is that with detailed energy-consumption information, companies can understand where and how they are using the most energy, and then pinpoint the most wasteful areas so they can reduce power and costs. The most effective software in this category goes beyond monitoring to provide advanced alerts, through which those in charge of energy management are informed when a problem is occurring based on typical trends and deviations from normal.

 

The benefits for cash-strapped, energy-aware businesses seem clear. After all, “if you can save even 10 percent” on energy costs, “that’s well worth doing,” notes Stuart Neumann, a Senior Manager at Verdantix. Moreover, data centers are using the devices to monitor uptime and availability, as well.

 

Geography Matters

The motivation to use energy management software for businesses also varies to some extent with geography. In 2012, the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) enters Phase 3, which will put stricter rules in place for energy consumption throughout Europe. In turn, this should increase demand for power monitoring and management software. In the U.S., with no federal mandates, cost savings are king. And in other areas of the world — India and China, for example — power demand is increasing much more rapidly than supply, prompting businesses to look for software solutions.

 

Nevertheless, just installing energy management and monitoring software won’t solve every problem a business may have. It’s a good first step, but without a systematic approach and a full commitment to it, you won’t achieve optimum results, experts say.

 

Clark says that businesses should hold one person accountable for energy use across the organization. Without that and a structured approach, “you’ll still have energy silos and won’t get the full benefit of the technology,” he says.

 

Over the next few years, Clark believes that both the technology and the consumer base will mature. Consumer products will make a comeback with better results, and the growing business-related interest products will expand to encompass global operations of a company. One thing is clear: The drivers — rising energy costs, increased demand and limited supply — will only become more critical.

 

Do you use energy management software in your business? Share your experience and results with your peers in a discussion in the Sustainability and Green IT group or add a comment to this blog.

0

Going green is not just a saying anymore, it has become a reality for many enterprises. Not only is becoming greener better for the environment, but it can also be better for the business's bottom line. More and more businesses are finding that by reducing their carbon footprint and monitoring their resources they are saving considerable amounts of money.  Listed below are a few articles that shed some light on going green and becoming more and more sustainable enterprise.

Solving the People, Planet and Profit Puzzle

Bryant University Magazine, (Spring 2010) tackles the issue of how to make workers happy and productive, reduce resources and carbon emissions, all while trying to make a business profitable and sustainable for years to come. It is not as hard as you may think.

Understanding your carbon footprint to create business value

Originally posted:  June 30, 2011.  Knowing the aspects of you business's carbon footprint can be essential to the health of the company. Some of the first steps are to understand your carbon footprint and to know what your stake holders are looking for. Once you have an understanding, being able to show progress and forecast for the future will unsure that you be able to deliver more business value.

Organizations that look in the “rearview mirror” often miss opportunities

Originally posted: July 7, 2011.  When data like carbon emissions gets collected it is just data. The data needs to be aggregated and grouped to turn it into usable information. Upon analysis of the information, we can provide intelligence, which can identify targeted actions to be taken.  This enables businesses to focus more time on the present and future sustainability actions, rather than always looking over their shoulder.

 

Although, many enterprises feel that green IT is a hassle and costs more money than it is worth, the truth is quite the contrary. If resources are managed more efficiently and proper sustainability measures are taken, down the road you can see decent cost savings. Using Green IT to your enterprise’s advantage can not only save you money, but will also keep the business looking forward, toward the future and keep you from getting stuck in the past.

0

Increasingly, companies need to look outside of the data center for their sustainability efforts.

Sam Murugesan, Cutter Consortium Senior consultant and co-editor of a new book, “Harnessing Green IT:  Principles and Practices” (Wily, 2011), was recently quoted in the June issue of Smart Enterprise magazine saying  that IT contributes only 2 to 3 percent of greenhouse emissions of a business.  The other 97 or 98 percent comes from inside a company.  He says there is a new wave of Green IT, which he calls Green IT 2.0.  In this new wave, the company needs to look outside of the data center for its sustainability efforts.  One such company embracing this idea is Wyndham Worldwide, the hospitality company.  They’ve launched Wyndham Green, a sustainability program that looks at ten green initiatives including:  the washing of linens, lighting, water use, recycling and more.  In addition they have outlined six core strategies:  energy conservation, water conservation, recycling /re-using, education, community involvement and innovations.  It’s a great web site and worth checking out.

For more on Wyndham Green and other company efforts including Capgemini and Shaw Industries, visit the June issue of Smart Enterprise magazine.

Is your organization looking outside the data center?  Let us know what initiatives your company is implementing.

1

 

 

The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) is an organization that many CIOs will need to know more about. As their companies begin to report data about carbon footprints and benchmark that data against companies of similar size and industry, the CDP may be an important resource. An independent, global, not-for-profit organization based in London, the group’s mission is to accelerate solutions to climate change by offering relevant information for business, policy and investment decisions.

 

 

To learn more about how IT managers can benefit from the organization’s activities, Smart Enterprise magazine Executive Editor, Karen J. Bannan, spoke recently with Dan Sokell, Manager of Technical Partnerships and Innovations at CDP.

 

 

What should CIOs know about the Carbon Disclosure Project?

 

 

It is the only independent global system through which more than 3,000 companies report their greenhouse gas emissions, water usage and assessment of climate change risk and opportunity. As such, the combined data has become the largest database of primary corporate climate change information in the world -- data that can be used as a competitive advantage.

 

 

Businesses and organizations use CDP data in a number of ways, including benchmarking against competitors, creating investment products and indexes, and formulating strategies for emissions reduction. As the disclosure process matures, there will be a trend to increased sector-specific disclosure, penetrating deeper into the pertinent issues for each sector. Toward this end, the CDP is already researching and developing an IT module for use in 2012.

 

 

What are the most effective things CIOs can do to help their organizations save energy?

 

 

Against a backdrop of increasing awareness of corporate sustainability, the need for more granular assessment, and the opportunities for innovation and efficiency savings, CIOs can only expect to see the existing focus on green IT increase. This will grow as there are more requirements for granular measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) at the IT facility, service, infrastructure and component levels.

 

 

IT leaders that respond will find competitive advantage revealed to them through the exposure of inefficiencies and opportunity. Armed with knowledge, the CIO can exploit advantage, through informed decision making and selection of appropriate technology solutions, be it virtualization, cloud computing or data center cooling, to name a few. 

 

 

 

Read the full article about Green IT 2.0 in Smart Enterprise magazine here.

 

And join your peers on the Sustainability and Green IT group on Smart Enterprise Exchange for additional content and discussions.

 


1

Could uploading a photo to Facebook cause global warming? Yes, if the data center is powered by coal. The cloud continues to grow and with it, large volumes of data that needs to be stored.  While most companies agree that they need to find a way to run data centers cheaper by using less energy, they also need to think about using clean energy to run it.

 

Greenpeace is on top of this and is encouraging companies to use cleaner energy.  Gary Cook Greenpeace IT Policy Analyst, who was quoted on GreenBiz.com, says Green IT should not be a choice between energy efficiency and clean electricity and that companies need to give equal attention to both to achieve true Green IT.

 

 

Some companies are taking the lead on this.  Yahoo is creating data centers near sources of renewable energy and Google is looking to wind energy for some of their centers.

 

Read the full article

 

 

How about you?  Is your company concerned with the type of power it uses for its data center? Find out about other businesses that are going green here.

0

I’ve always been interested in alternative energy sources.  In fact I used to have a clock powered by a potato on my desk at MTV, back in the 80’s.  Not sure if anyone reading this is old enough to remember that science experiment where you used a potato as a battery.

 

 

I came across an interesting article on how organizations are using alternative sources to power their data centers.  They are not using potatoes -- although I would love to see that as it would be a true source of renewable and reusable power---you could eat the potatoes for lunch after their job is done.

 

 

Regardless, here are a few interesting ideas that seem very doable and can have a decent return on investment as well.

 

North County Transit District, (NCTD) a San Diego agency which handles ticketing for 12 million public transportation users is looking to solar power to provide energy for its data center.  According to Angela Miller, the agency’s CIO, this initiative has even given the project an ROI since the NCTD can sell back solar generated power to the local utility to earn credits on AC power usage.

Of course, solar may not be the best data center power source in colder, less sunny areas of the country.

 

 

Syracuse University in New York has spent $12 million to build a data center that uses natural gas fired micro turbines to generate its power on-site according to Christopher Sedore, CIO at the University.  The turbines can generate both heat and cooling and any extra power generated can be sold back to the local power company.

 

 

Hydrogen fuels cells, currently used by Google, Whole Foods and Verizon for office or retail space power, is proving to be an alternative source to power the data center.  Although expensive to use, First National Bank of Omaha has invested in this technology by building a 200,000 square foot fuel cell powered data center.  Brenda Dooley, president of First National Buildings, a bank subsidiary that handles corporate real estate and facilities management, said the bank feels the investment is worth the price due to the reliability of this type of power.  Dooley adds that the loss of uptime in processing credit card transactions is very costly so using these fuel cells actually gives the bank an excellent ROI.

 

 

Read the full article

 

 

What are you doing to find alternative energy resources to power your data centers? 



We encourage your feedback. Reach out via the "Contact the Editor" and "Contact the Concierge" services for any needs, questions or comments. We look forward to serving you!

Paula Klein, Smart Enterprise Exchange Editor
e-mail

Ellen Lalier, Smart Enterprise Exchange Concierge
e-mail
phone 516-562-5727; fax 516-562-5466