Skip navigation
Twitter   Follow us  •   Share   Share    Become a member

Professional Development

2 Posts tagged with the teams tag
0

You’re doing well in your career. You’re dedicated, skilled, technically competent, a recognized leader in your company and a valued employee. Your performance reviews are excellent, and your manager has complete confidence in your abilities. So why would you want (or need) an executive coach?

 

This is a good question to consider, so I offer some insights here that apply generally and also specifically to IT execs who want to flourish in their careers. First, in a recent article in The New Yorker magazine, a renowned surgeon talked about getting a specialized surgeon’s coach who could give him feedback on how he performed in the surgical suite. Although his outcomes were good, his reputation was impeccable and his interpersonal skills were excellent, he felt he was too comfortable, and wondered how he really did in all aspects of his work life and how he could improve. Knowing that he could not be objective about his own behavior, the surgeon decided that an outside set of eyes and ears would provide a mirror to his actual behavior. He wanted to improve, so he hired a coach.

 

Also consider this: In their book, Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives, Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler write about how changes in medicine, technology or finance will not work effectively without the appropriate behavioral change in the user. You can give out millions of mosquito nets to prevent malaria, but if people do not use them, they are useless. Vaccines prevent illnesses as long as people get vaccinated. The authors call this phenomenon "bio-social science" and think that in the 21st century, it is key to changing behavior.

 

How does this related to IT executives? It’s often said that people with technical training put less emphasis on interpersonal skills. But behavioral change requires a change in how we perceive the world and a trusted way to learn the new behaviors. Having a coach to reflect and build on what you do well is part of how extremely successful people stay at that uppermost level. They can assess your skills and work on nuanced behavior may result in better outcomes for you and your business team.

 

If we become complacent in what we do and stop striving for better outcomes when we are already successful, we also assume that we cannot change the behavior of others—an important trait for high-level managers. Many also think executive coaching is meant for the problematic or dysfunctional individual. But, in fact, all of us could benefit from the outside perspective on our behavior that coaching provides.

 

As The New Yorker article suggests, just as the best opera singers have singing coaches, the most celebrated athletes continue working with personal trainers — even when they are regarded as the best in their sport — and the top CEOs have coaches to use as sounding boards, shouldn't you have an executive coach as well?

0

As an  executive coach, I have had many individual clients who were not good managers or strong leaders. A poor manager impacts the  team negatively, which often leads to lower productivity and inadequate  results.

 

I have also coached great leaders, adored by their teams, who  accomplish amazing results but cannot get along with a terrible boss. In both  cases I wondered, what is a "good boss," and why does coaching work to make them  more successful?

 

A recent New York Times article, March 13, 2011,  described the process that Google, (the mega-giant of information) used in  ascertaining what is a productive, successful leader as measured by their teams.  The Google HR folks looked at several years worth of data, massaging the  information into numerous categories in order to discover what made a "good"  leader. After the complex process was completed, Google's HR folks came up with  8 significant traits.

 

What was most interesting about the ranking of these 8  traits was that coming in dead last -- remember this is Google, the king of  technology, the master of information -- was "technical expertise!"

 

At the other end of the spectrum, the  two most vital traits for successful leadership was having a clear  vision for the team and connecting with team members in more social terms.  In other words, good bosses know where they are going and make consistent,  quality time for the individuals who need to get to the goal. Team  members willingly followed bosses they trusted with the team's  success.

 

It turns out that even at Google, leadership is not about the  hard skills, but rather about the soft ones. People leave companies when they  have a bad boss. They thrive when they feel involved, valued, communicated with,  and when they trust their leader.

 

I am not sure that hundreds of pages of data were needed to prove that the leaders and bosses at Google have the same traits as  the leaders elsewhere. Research has shown the same results over and over again.Yet, when Google did the analysis, their results were similar.

 

Executive coaching enhances social soft skills and eliminates behaviors that get in  the way of success. In fact, what does Google do for their less-than-good leaders? You  guessed it. They get the individual a coach!!
This blog first appeared on DLS Coaching's web site.
###


We encourage your feedback. Reach out via the "Contact the Editor" and "Contact the Concierge" services for any needs, questions or comments. We look forward to serving you!

Paula Klein, Smart Enterprise Exchange Editor
e-mail

Ellen Lalier, Smart Enterprise Exchange Concierge
e-mail
phone 516-562-5727; fax 516-562-5466