Skip navigation
Twitter   Follow us  •   Share   Share    Become a member

Professional Development

2 Posts tagged with the peter_delisi tag
2

Cloud. Mobile devices. Social media. At a time when new technologies are coming at IT leaders fast and furiously, how can you evaluate whether these technologies provide real business value or whether they are the latest technological fads?

 

I know that most IT leaders don't need much help in evaluating the purely technical merits of new products and services. I believe, however, that technology may well be the least important of the decision-making criteria you need to use. If so, what other criteria will help you make wise and rapid purchasing choices in response to ongoing business demands?

 

I believe the fundamental question that you need to ask and answer is: "What unique value will this technology provide my enterprise?" In a previous blog, I had argued that maximum IT value can only be delivered at the level of corporate goals; anything else is suboptimal. It follows, then, that any technology that can help the enterprise grow revenue, be more profitable, better satisfy customers and/or gain greater competitive advantage would be highly desirable. Conversely, if it doesn’t meet these requirements, it may not warrant your consideration — and dollars.

 

Demonstrating Unique Value

How do you apply this to your daily IT life? Well, for example, when client/server technology emerged in the late ’70s and early ’80s, I was asked by a CIO how he might explain the new technology to his senior executives. I had learned that it was fruitless to explain new technologies in technical terms; senior executives relate much better to business terms. So I explained to the CIO that the client/server technology era was the first time since the agricultural economy that we had the potential to put the person, the work and the technology back together again. In the intervening hundreds of years, successive developments had served to isolate these elements. With client/server technology, I explained, people now had “power on the desktop" with which to enhance the work they performed and to use it for the organization’s success. That was of unique value to the enterprise.

 

Later, in the ’90s when the Internet appeared, I was asked to lead a panel at the World Economic Development Congress on "IT and the Global Corporation." It was a new subject at the time, and I needed to do research to prepare for the event — a perfect opportunity to use the search capabilities of the Internet to see what I could find out about my topic.

 

I was amazed to get back in seconds 10 initial responses that appeared to be related to my subject. In fact, the first paper on the list, written by a professor in Switzerland, was perfect for the subject, and I subsequently made contact with the author, who directed me to other sources that helped with the panel topic. This experience led me to later communicate to my audience at the Congress that the benefit of the Internet was its ability to "reduce time to knowledge." In other words, it enabled people and organizations to learn faster. Even more significantly, it tied nicely at the time with the strategic imperative that the only sustainable competitive advantage was to learn faster than your competitors.

 

What Social Science Can Teach Us

While these examples clearly make the case for emerging technology investment, it’s not always that simple. Besides strategic value, the historical, human, social and cultural correlates of technology must be considered. After all, technology has its own unique history and is heavily influenced by personal psychology, group dynamics and cultural expectations.

 

A number of studies describe the relationship between technology and organizational culture. (See, for example, Shoshana Zuboff’s seminal book, In the Age of the Smart Machine.) For IT leaders, it may come down to asking: "Is my network compatible with my organizational culture?" One case that raised this issue was when IBM shut down an internal user network, VNet, in the 1980s because it fostered too much dissent. At the time, IBM had a strong command-and-control culture and didn't tolerate a free flow of internal expression. However, earlier social science research, conducted as far back as the 1940s at Carnegie Mellon University, had already demonstrated that many-to-many networks did indeed enable free expression of thought.

 

Today, IT leaders dealing with similar issues, such as social media use within the enterprise, can also look at social science research for advice and precedents. Despite some popular belief, for example, recent studies — including my own current research — have concluded that social media is not conducive to personal and professional effectiveness and can also be an inhibitor to creativity.

 

Learning from Mistakes

IT leaders can and should use a historical perspective to evaluate new technologies. The philosopher George Santayana related, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” As an IBM salesman in the late 1960s, I sold computers to many organizations that previously had their processing done in the "cloud" — known as service bureaus at the time. It turns out that companies decided to bring their computing back in-house mostly for nontechnical reasons. With our current interest in the cloud, it remains to be seen whether we have learned from those mistakes.

 

The point is that today’s emerging technology decisions can’t be made in a vacuum despite the need for speed. Historical, organizational and social factors all have to be considered to yield the greatest value for the business.

 

******

 

Peter S. DeLisi is President of Organizational Synergies and Academic Dean, Information Technology Leadership Program, Santa Clara University.

Organizational Synergies is a strategy consulting firm located in Fremont, Calif. Previously, Pete spent 16years at Digital Equipment Corp.---eight of those years as a consultant to large, Fortune 500-size customers.

He has been published in the Sloan Management Review, Harvard Business  Review, Business Horizons and Journal of Management Inquiry. He is also an internationally recognized speaker.

Pete is also a member of Smart Enterprise Exchange and can be reached on this site.

1

http://i.cmpnet.com/designcentral/caseewebsite/headshots/peter_delisi_large.jpgThe challenges for senior IT leaders these days are overwhelming. In addition to understanding and dealing with new technologies, such as the cloud and mobile computing, they are increasingly called upon to be change agents, strategic planners and innovation drivers, and to contribute to top-line growth.

 

In particular, the issue of top-line growth and IT’s ability to make a meaningful contribution at this very significant, corporate level is top-of-mind right now. I know from experience that this can be a big challenge for CIOs.

 

 

For the past 13 years, the IT Leadership Program at Santa Clara University in California has convened to address some of these issues. A major part of the three-day event is a case study/role play in which participants have the opportunity to practice the skills we teach them. The case study involves a request from a senior vice president of sales for IT to help him or her achieve the objective of top-line growth. In the three-part exercise, the student teams are first presented with the problem; they subsequently dig deeper into its details; and finally, they present their best solution to help the executive achieve the objective. Here’s the grabber: In 13 years of doing the case, only one team — out of approximately 150 — has successfully solved the case.

 

 

Ask the Right Questions

 

Why is this such a difficult assignment? For starters, the students must understand the business of the sales organization, but beyond that, they must understand the strategy of the sales organization — something they can accomplish in the interview opportunity that we give them. Yet, few know the right questions to ask. To learn about strategy, they should make the following request of the senior sales executive: “Help me understand how a sales organization achieves top-line growth. What strategies do you employ?”

 

 

Then, through active listening, they will learn everything they need to know from the VP of sales to solve the problem and to come back with an innovative IT solution that contributes to top-line growth. Without this strategic knowledge — gained by asking questions — it is impossible to solve the case.

 

I don’t view this only as an academic textbook exercise. I can say with great confidence that this example is very real world: IT can’t contribute to top-line growth unless it understands the strategies the company employs to achieve SALES growth. Surprisingly, there are only six to eight key strategies companies use to grow their business, regardless of industry or global geography.

Examples are:

 

  • Add more sales people.
  • Introduce new products and/or services.
  • Merge with another company.
  • Raise product prices.
  • Increase yield per salesperson.
  • Gain greater market share.

 

 

Armed with this type of knowledge, the IT organization can creatively determine what role, if any, IT can play in each strategy. Let me give one brief example of how this might work.

 

 

Being able to increase the yield-per-salesperson is a powerful strategy. Imagine a large sales organization with 1,000 salespeople and average sales of $1 million per salesperson. If one could increase the average sales yield by 5 percent, that would result in $50 million of additional sales per year. One IT solution seldom mentioned in our case study exercise would be to develop a win/loss knowledge management system in which we would combine a database system with analytics to tell us why we win and why we lose. Armed with this knowledge, each salesperson could be potentially more effective and close more sales.

 

 

IT people can acquire the kind of knowledge about sales that I am suggesting without formal education or extensive training. While education is a good idea, I’m suggesting that IT people need to learn to think strategically and to ask the right strategic questions of their internal clients — and their top managers. For years, we have told IT people that they need to “learn the business,” but in all fairness, we need to be more specific and tell them what it is about the business they need to learn. We hope this discussion will start that process.

 

 

How do you ”learn the business” at your enterprise? Can you share your tips with others?

 

 

******

 

Peter S. DeLisi is President of Organizational Synergies and Academic Dean, Information Technology Leadership Program, Santa   Clara University.

Organizational Synergies is a strategy consulting firm located in Fremont, Calif. Previously, Pete spent 16years at Digital Equipment Corp.---eight of those years as a consultant to large, Fortune 500-size customers.

He has been published in the Sloan Management Review, Harvard Business  Review, Business Horizons and Journal of Management Inquiry. He is also an internationally recognized speaker.

Pete is also a member of Smart Enterprise Exchange and can be reached on this site.



We encourage your feedback. Reach out via the "Contact the Editor" and "Contact the Concierge" services for any needs, questions or comments. We look forward to serving you!

Paula Klein, Smart Enterprise Exchange Editor
e-mail

Ellen Lalier, Smart Enterprise Exchange Concierge
e-mail
phone 516-562-5727; fax 516-562-5466