Skip navigation
Twitter   Follow us  •   Share   Share    Become a member

Professional Development

2 Posts tagged with the cloud tag
2

Cloud. Mobile devices. Social media. At a time when new technologies are coming at IT leaders fast and furiously, how can you evaluate whether these technologies provide real business value or whether they are the latest technological fads?

 

I know that most IT leaders don't need much help in evaluating the purely technical merits of new products and services. I believe, however, that technology may well be the least important of the decision-making criteria you need to use. If so, what other criteria will help you make wise and rapid purchasing choices in response to ongoing business demands?

 

I believe the fundamental question that you need to ask and answer is: "What unique value will this technology provide my enterprise?" In a previous blog, I had argued that maximum IT value can only be delivered at the level of corporate goals; anything else is suboptimal. It follows, then, that any technology that can help the enterprise grow revenue, be more profitable, better satisfy customers and/or gain greater competitive advantage would be highly desirable. Conversely, if it doesn’t meet these requirements, it may not warrant your consideration — and dollars.

 

Demonstrating Unique Value

How do you apply this to your daily IT life? Well, for example, when client/server technology emerged in the late ’70s and early ’80s, I was asked by a CIO how he might explain the new technology to his senior executives. I had learned that it was fruitless to explain new technologies in technical terms; senior executives relate much better to business terms. So I explained to the CIO that the client/server technology era was the first time since the agricultural economy that we had the potential to put the person, the work and the technology back together again. In the intervening hundreds of years, successive developments had served to isolate these elements. With client/server technology, I explained, people now had “power on the desktop" with which to enhance the work they performed and to use it for the organization’s success. That was of unique value to the enterprise.

 

Later, in the ’90s when the Internet appeared, I was asked to lead a panel at the World Economic Development Congress on "IT and the Global Corporation." It was a new subject at the time, and I needed to do research to prepare for the event — a perfect opportunity to use the search capabilities of the Internet to see what I could find out about my topic.

 

I was amazed to get back in seconds 10 initial responses that appeared to be related to my subject. In fact, the first paper on the list, written by a professor in Switzerland, was perfect for the subject, and I subsequently made contact with the author, who directed me to other sources that helped with the panel topic. This experience led me to later communicate to my audience at the Congress that the benefit of the Internet was its ability to "reduce time to knowledge." In other words, it enabled people and organizations to learn faster. Even more significantly, it tied nicely at the time with the strategic imperative that the only sustainable competitive advantage was to learn faster than your competitors.

 

What Social Science Can Teach Us

While these examples clearly make the case for emerging technology investment, it’s not always that simple. Besides strategic value, the historical, human, social and cultural correlates of technology must be considered. After all, technology has its own unique history and is heavily influenced by personal psychology, group dynamics and cultural expectations.

 

A number of studies describe the relationship between technology and organizational culture. (See, for example, Shoshana Zuboff’s seminal book, In the Age of the Smart Machine.) For IT leaders, it may come down to asking: "Is my network compatible with my organizational culture?" One case that raised this issue was when IBM shut down an internal user network, VNet, in the 1980s because it fostered too much dissent. At the time, IBM had a strong command-and-control culture and didn't tolerate a free flow of internal expression. However, earlier social science research, conducted as far back as the 1940s at Carnegie Mellon University, had already demonstrated that many-to-many networks did indeed enable free expression of thought.

 

Today, IT leaders dealing with similar issues, such as social media use within the enterprise, can also look at social science research for advice and precedents. Despite some popular belief, for example, recent studies — including my own current research — have concluded that social media is not conducive to personal and professional effectiveness and can also be an inhibitor to creativity.

 

Learning from Mistakes

IT leaders can and should use a historical perspective to evaluate new technologies. The philosopher George Santayana related, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” As an IBM salesman in the late 1960s, I sold computers to many organizations that previously had their processing done in the "cloud" — known as service bureaus at the time. It turns out that companies decided to bring their computing back in-house mostly for nontechnical reasons. With our current interest in the cloud, it remains to be seen whether we have learned from those mistakes.

 

The point is that today’s emerging technology decisions can’t be made in a vacuum despite the need for speed. Historical, organizational and social factors all have to be considered to yield the greatest value for the business.

 

******

 

Peter S. DeLisi is President of Organizational Synergies and Academic Dean, Information Technology Leadership Program, Santa Clara University.

Organizational Synergies is a strategy consulting firm located in Fremont, Calif. Previously, Pete spent 16years at Digital Equipment Corp.---eight of those years as a consultant to large, Fortune 500-size customers.

He has been published in the Sloan Management Review, Harvard Business  Review, Business Horizons and Journal of Management Inquiry. He is also an internationally recognized speaker.

Pete is also a member of Smart Enterprise Exchange and can be reached on this site.

0

 

Executive coach Dina Lichtman speaks with online media expert, Elizabeth Osder

 

As an executive coach who works with CTOs and CIOs in all kinds of companies, I often run across leaders who fail to embrace the newest, cutting-edge technology. It might be out of fear or lack of knowledge, but the outcome is the same … lost opportunities with their internal users and external customers.

 

The fact is, businesses have forever changed, and a world of more nimble, cost-effective tools, coupled with new consumer behavior, means that there is no turning back. As many have stated and current research indicates, CIOs face a unique challenge in dealing with these massive disruptions.

 

In light of these trends, I recently spoke to Elizabeth Osder, President of The Osder Group — an e-commerce and marketing consultancy — about the latest technology trends and cloud applications. In particular, I wanted her view of what impact the cloud will have on CIOs. Here are some excerpts from that conversation.

 

 

“Old World” Thinking

Elizabeth says that CIOs have traditionally viewed the world in an “Old World” way: “The priority and framework for a good CIO had been to innovate information sharing in ways that cut costs and increased productivity. CIOs tended to ask questions such as these:

 

  • What computer networking system do I need?
  • What's the best telephone solution?
  • Where do I store my data; how do I keep it secure?
  • How do I manage a large IT staff and run a support desk?
  • Do I buy, build or partner?”

 

 

“New World” Approaches

By contrast, Elizabeth says, CIOs who understand the current environment understand the following “New World” approaches: “The digital world is making it increasingly easy to partner and borrow services that are low cost, and sometimes free. Old-world, big-business goals that required huge budgets can be achieved in a variety of new-world ways. Often, IT is now about solving new problems - moving from project management to product development.” As a result, she adds, “new products may emerge, and there is no clear set of instructions. Good digital product development is agile and nimble, and innovation results from testing and learning in the market.”

 

It’s not a matter of throwing out everything that came before, she says: “IT still needs to carry out some of the traditional goals along with the new. Above all, [IT executives] need to operate more nimble and experimental organizations.”

 

As an example, Elizabeth notes that in the media industry, “early digital efforts were often owned and defined by IT. Currently, the technology teams that support new product development are often separate, more nimble, and unencumbered by traditional IT. The difficult question is: can a CIO play in both worlds or are they wedded to Old World IT practices?”

 

Elizabeth asks “how CIOs-- who are used to buying and building to clearly defined specifications-- will approach new challenges in the consumption of information.” For instance, how will they adapt to and invent solutions using wireless devices, iPads as sales tools, and real-time alerts? Will they be ready for these rapidly moving innovations?”

 

Implementing Change

Based on her research and experience, Elizabeth explains why it's hard to implement change: “CIOs have big staffs that deal with technology they have purchased or built. What do you do with these staffers as consumerization takes hold? Is this a time for massive layoffs or for retraining? How do you innovate with cloud-based systems when many middle management jobs rely on running large infrastructure systems?” How do you secure new technologies?

 

Among the examples of Old World vs. New World options, she cites are: Microsoft Office vs. Google Docs; shared servers vs. Dropbox; telephone systems vs. Skype; FaceTime and iChat; email vs. real-time chat; cloud computing vs. infrastructure. They must ask themselves: “Do I rent space that flexes with my need, or do I build and maintain a castle?

 

Moving to the Cloud Painlessly 

Osder Group offers solutions and says that those who experiment, test and design using various solutions can learn and explore new ways. It may also help if an organization creates an independent innovation group and freeing members from the hierarchy of the old organization.

 

A final bit of advice is for CIOs to talk to their internal and external customers, see how behavior is changing, and develop products to make work more efficient.



We encourage your feedback. Reach out via the "Contact the Editor" and "Contact the Concierge" services for any needs, questions or comments. We look forward to serving you!

Paula Klein, Smart Enterprise Exchange Editor
e-mail

Ellen Lalier, Smart Enterprise Exchange Concierge
e-mail
phone 516-562-5727; fax 516-562-5466