Skip navigation
Twitter   Follow us  •   Share   Share    Become a member

Editor's Notes

2 Posts tagged with the private_cloud tag
1

What’s up with cloud computing? It’s been more than a year since major service providers — Amazon, Microsoft and Google — joined dozens of software companies to offer hosted services for business applications, infrastructure and development platforms. The buzz has been continuous and loud.

 

Many pundits told us that large, risk-averse businesses were leaning toward private clouds — where they hosted apps themselves for internal customers — versus public clouds. In his recent blog, for instance, Ted Ritter wrote that the Nemertes Research 2011/12 enterprise IT benchmark study found “very high interest in private clouds. In fact, 35 percent of the 240 organizations participating in the benchmark will have a private cloud within the next two years.”

 

And as far back as last year, blogger Robin Bloor wrote: “It’s difficult for a CIO today not to be considering a cloud-related strategy. Over the past three years, these hosted services have acquired marketing sparkle, and every IT vendor worth its socks has developed offerings.”

 

Ravi Rajagopal, Vice President, Cloud Strategy, CA Technologies, also wrote that “74 percent of enterprises have deployed a cloud service and have allocated up to 30 percent in cloud spending, and about 70 percent of enterprises are investing in building private clouds,” based on an Avanade 2011 Cloud Global Survey.

 

The verdict on cloud adoption sounds pretty clear, right? Well, maybe not. Just last month at the Interop New York conference, Lauren Nelson, Researcher at Forrester Research, said that very few organizations have actually implemented internal private cloud environments.

 

Nelson said that just 6 percent of those surveyed had internal private clouds in place in early 2011. And at another session I attended, Great Debate: We Will Always Have Private Clouds, industry analysts avidly debated the merits and the future of private clouds. One team's job was to persuade you that we'll always have on-premises private clouds, and the other's job was to argue that we'll eventually move to a utility model where you never touch your servers.[More on this session to follow].

 

Even this far along the adoption curve, then, it seems as if we’re running into definitional differences over what constitutes a private cloud. Forrester says it should have characteristics such as automated deployment and management, self-service access, shared architecture between business units, and pay-per-use billing.

 

Ritter noted that “When analysts talk about private clouds, we assume everyone is on the same page: A cloud is a metered, multitenant, accessible, elastic and self-provisioned service offering.” While most enterprise IT professionals agree with these characteristics, he says they also resist automated self-provisioning.

 

Perhaps, that’s why Timothy Chou, an early cloud advocate, chooses to describe cloud services as data center, compute and store, application and platform services rather than public versus private cloud in his primer here. And Andrew McAfee, author and digital business professor at MIT, in the current issue of Harvard Business Review offers an insightful blog about what CEOs need to know about the cloud here, with lots of perceptive comments noted by readers. Perhaps the fine-tuning is a sign that the market is maturing.

 

How is your business approaching cloud services? Our current poll on Smart Enterprise Exchange so far indicates more enterprises using cloud than not—but many are still in the early stages. Perhaps CA Technology VP George Watt’s assessment is most accurate when he says: “Cloud computing is like a band that took 20 years to become an overnight success.”

 

We will be offering additional insights and thought leadership regarding private, public and hybrid clouds in the next few months. Meanwhile, please take the poll and add your vote as well as your comments to this ongoing discussion.

 

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

July 2010

 

Although it is definitely possible to see results from smaller, incremental projects, bigger certainly looks better when it comes to most IT innovation. It seems to me that what some CIOs view as “practical” innovation, however, might be far out of reach for the majority of businesses today. As an example, in a wide-ranging conversation about innovation and other topics, two leading CIOs each discussed how they have built their own private cloud networks.

 

To me, these CIOs clearly represent the leading edge of IT, not the mainstream. John Halamka, CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, is well-known as an intrepid early adopter of emerging technologies and an e-healthcare industry leader, as his blog often explains. Speaking with Smart Enterprise Exchange recently for an upcoming podcast about Practical Innovation, Halamka said that the size of his operations has allowed him to host e-health record services for several smaller hospitals.

 

“If there were a cloud offering available with the security and privacy I need, I’d use it,” he said, “but [my IT operation is] big enough to provide e-health record services for smaller users from our cloud,” he said. Halamka has 5,000 CPUs and “petabytes of storage” available “at low cost for thousands of users in the Harvard community.”

 

Another innovation podcast panelist, Richard Plane, who was until very recently the VP and CIO at Aviat Networks, formerly Harris Stratex Networks, has also built a private cloud for use by the company. Plane said he was looking for a public cloud provider “to seamlessly manage” the private cloud and public offerings. Using only a public network might lower costs, he said, but since most public providers still need to do more work on security, Plane is sticking with the private option for now. He recently joined Harris' Cyber Integrated Solutions as head of solutions development and delivery.

 

Long term, both CIOs expect to show financial savings as well as productivity improvements and better services with their cloud options. In fact, Halamka said that in a hosted private cloud environment, he can cut about 50 percent of the support costs of solution delivery. “Demand for services far exceeds budget growth. We have to cut costs with cloud and outsourcing” options, he said. Moreover, their cloud efforts represent just one innovation among many that these two CIOs' businesses are pursuing.

 

Tom Kendra, Executive Vice President for CA Technologies’ Enterprise Products and Solutions business line, agreed that cloud models give CIOs more choices for delivering services to internal and external customers. CIOs are now “managing a supply chain of options — all driven by technology innovation,” he said.

 

All CIOs may have more options with cloud technology, but as with other emerging technology efforts, the playing field is not level; bigger businesses have far more choices — and therefore, advantages — than others.

 

The full podcast includes discussion about mobile devices, virtualization and alternate IT delivery models as well as Practical Innovation. It will be posted on Smart Enterprise Exchange very soon.

 

Meanwhile, I invite you to share your experiences about funding IT innovation efforts such as cloud computing. Will you develop your own private clouds — or will you be among those who use the services of others?

 

And if you are concerned about cloud security, this month we also feature a Q&A with Nils Puhlmann, co-founder of the Cloud Security Alliance, who (surprisingly?), says that many security concerns are overstated. You can read the interview here.

 


Paula Klein
Editor and Community Manager
Smart Enterprise Exchange



We encourage your feedback. Reach out via the "Contact the Editor" and "Contact the Concierge" services for any needs, questions or comments. We look forward to serving you!

Paula Klein, Smart Enterprise Exchange Editor
e-mail

Ellen Lalier, Smart Enterprise Exchange Concierge
e-mail
phone 516-562-5727; fax 516-562-5466