Skip navigation
Twitter   Follow us  •   Share   Share    Become a member

Editor's Notes

4 Posts tagged with the interop tag
1

What’s up with cloud computing? It’s been more than a year since major service providers — Amazon, Microsoft and Google — joined dozens of software companies to offer hosted services for business applications, infrastructure and development platforms. The buzz has been continuous and loud.

 

Many pundits told us that large, risk-averse businesses were leaning toward private clouds — where they hosted apps themselves for internal customers — versus public clouds. In his recent blog, for instance, Ted Ritter wrote that the Nemertes Research 2011/12 enterprise IT benchmark study found “very high interest in private clouds. In fact, 35 percent of the 240 organizations participating in the benchmark will have a private cloud within the next two years.”

 

And as far back as last year, blogger Robin Bloor wrote: “It’s difficult for a CIO today not to be considering a cloud-related strategy. Over the past three years, these hosted services have acquired marketing sparkle, and every IT vendor worth its socks has developed offerings.”

 

Ravi Rajagopal, Vice President, Cloud Strategy, CA Technologies, also wrote that “74 percent of enterprises have deployed a cloud service and have allocated up to 30 percent in cloud spending, and about 70 percent of enterprises are investing in building private clouds,” based on an Avanade 2011 Cloud Global Survey.

 

The verdict on cloud adoption sounds pretty clear, right? Well, maybe not. Just last month at the Interop New York conference, Lauren Nelson, Researcher at Forrester Research, said that very few organizations have actually implemented internal private cloud environments.

 

Nelson said that just 6 percent of those surveyed had internal private clouds in place in early 2011. And at another session I attended, Great Debate: We Will Always Have Private Clouds, industry analysts avidly debated the merits and the future of private clouds. One team's job was to persuade you that we'll always have on-premises private clouds, and the other's job was to argue that we'll eventually move to a utility model where you never touch your servers.[More on this session to follow].

 

Even this far along the adoption curve, then, it seems as if we’re running into definitional differences over what constitutes a private cloud. Forrester says it should have characteristics such as automated deployment and management, self-service access, shared architecture between business units, and pay-per-use billing.

 

Ritter noted that “When analysts talk about private clouds, we assume everyone is on the same page: A cloud is a metered, multitenant, accessible, elastic and self-provisioned service offering.” While most enterprise IT professionals agree with these characteristics, he says they also resist automated self-provisioning.

 

Perhaps, that’s why Timothy Chou, an early cloud advocate, chooses to describe cloud services as data center, compute and store, application and platform services rather than public versus private cloud in his primer here. And Andrew McAfee, author and digital business professor at MIT, in the current issue of Harvard Business Review offers an insightful blog about what CEOs need to know about the cloud here, with lots of perceptive comments noted by readers. Perhaps the fine-tuning is a sign that the market is maturing.

 

How is your business approaching cloud services? Our current poll on Smart Enterprise Exchange so far indicates more enterprises using cloud than not—but many are still in the early stages. Perhaps CA Technology VP George Watt’s assessment is most accurate when he says: “Cloud computing is like a band that took 20 years to become an overnight success.”

 

We will be offering additional insights and thought leadership regarding private, public and hybrid clouds in the next few months. Meanwhile, please take the poll and add your vote as well as your comments to this ongoing discussion.

 

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

Tablets are immature when it comes to enterprise-level management, security and functionality, according to Paul DeBeasi, Research VP, Gartner.  At best, “tablets will augment, not replace, notebooks,” since tablets are “optimized for consumers of content, not creators of content,” he said at the recent New York Interop conference.

 

Chris Hazelton, Research Director, Mobile & Wireless at the 451 Group and ChangeWave Research, meanwhile, countered with August data showing that 16 percent of 1,618 corporations were providing tablets to employees — up from 4 percent in May 2010. In a market where IT spending is flat, that’s a significant amount, he said.

 

The debate over enterprise support of tablets and mobile devices continued on October 5, when the analysts squared off on the topic of whether your next notebook will be a tablet.

 

DeBeasi agreed that tablets are exciting and growing, and Gartner estimates that 300 million will be shipped by 2015. But tablet growth won’t be primarily in enterprises. The new paradigm, he said, will be a multidevice work model where users will select “the best device (smartphone, tablet, notebook) for the job.” The more important question is: “How do we synchronize our content and context among all of our devices?

 

Additionally, DeBeasi said that technology is changing so rapidly that the endpoint devices of today, including tablets, phones and notebooks, won’t be the same in the future. “They are all morphing,” he said.

 

Hazelton agreed that the “form factors” may change, yet mobile apps are on the rise. At present, most business users employ tablets for checking email (70%), accessing the Internet (70%) and working away from the office (68%), but such uses as customer presentations (44%), sales support (43%) and tablets as replacements for laptops (36%), are gaining speed. Perhaps even more significantly, more than half of 505 businesses surveyed by ChangeWave in March said they will deploy two or more mobile apps in 2011.

 

While the debate attracted advocates on each side, to my mind, it’s not an either/or question-- each device will have a user base and each is optimal for a given application. Until device nirvana is reached—whatever form that may take-- the larger issue for enterprise IT is how to get through the interim period when multiple devices need support, service and funding. No one disagrees that short term management will be a challenge.

 

 

Read more about mobile device sessions at Interop here and more about Mobile-driven businesses here.

0

Once tablets and smartphones rule the corporate environment, who will be liable for mobile device support — users or the business? More importantly, how many devices can any single user realistically own and use? Will unified communications (UC) become more urgent?

 

These questions and others were raised and debated at the recent Interop conference in New York. Now that the proliferation of consumer devices is a given, what will the mobile future look like at global enterprises?

 

I found some interesting answers and insights at an analyst roundtable led by Rohit Mehra, Director of Enterprise Communications Infrastructure at IDC. He predicted that the BYOD (bring your own device) trend will persist, yet he expects corporate-supplied mobile devices to increase as well. By 2015, IDC forecasts a nearly even split between smartphones supported by the business (45.3%) and those that users will be expected to maintain on their own (54.7%).

 

As tablets gain legitimacy in the enterprise, the bond between mobile and UC will grow tighter, he said. “Finally, mobile UC will take off,” he said, but while the IEEE 802.11 has become a de facto industry standard for wireless LANs and Wi-Fi, newer standards may emerge making interoperability difficult.

 

Five Devices per Person?

Then there are the challenges posed by the sheer number of devices. IDC expects that people will use as many as five mobile devices of all types, depending on their situation, location and the workload. It’s a number that illustrates the convergence of business and personal life, said Mark Lowenstein, Managing Director, Mobile Ecosystem. Lowenstein said that the desire of mobile users for constant connectivity and low pricing, however, “doesn’t jibe yet” with current cloud models and architectures. By his estimates, 15 to 20 percent of mobile devices are currently enterprise-liable.

 

On the app side of the equation, Bob Egan, VP Mobile Strategy and Chief Analyst, Mobiquity, cited a new Egan/Dresner Mobile BI Study that shows “seismic shifts” in how consumers will acquire their mobile business apps in the next few years. Specifically, he suggested that enterprises will increasingly offer apps themselves, as will mobile operators, as opposed to users getting them from third parties and app stores. Longer term, the apps will be available on the cloud.

 

IT Keeps Some Control

What’s really happening, in Egan’s view, is what he calls the “IT-ization of the workforce.” This means that IT will continue to determine which apps employees are allowed and individual industries will provide governance, lifecycle management and even apps. IT executives may be heartened by his belief that “BYOD won’t take over enterprise,” especially in highly regulated industries where governance and risk play a big role.

 

Meanwhile, Andrew Borg, Senior Research Analyst, Wireless and Mobility, at Aberdeen Group, noted a widespread confluence taking place among social media, mobile apps and the cloud.

 

Among other key points discussed were:

 

  • Most believe that the future of RIM’s BlackBerry is weak at best (and this was before the recent RIM outages!) Mehra thinks it will be around for a while longer, based on its installed base.

 

  • Lowenstein noted that Apple is clearly gaining serious ground at RIM’s expense in the enterprise, and he expects some consolidation of the market to take place in the next year. Borg said that Microsoft should not be discounted in either the smartphone or the tablet market.

 

  • Security and authentication will continue to be the biggest challenge for mobile enterprises. That is where users will want to defer to corporate IT, and IT will want to leverage existing systems. Many different pricing and service plans will be tried, including site licensing for corporate apps, and even pushing the cost of regulatory compliance and security back to employees. Overall, mobile spending is rising quickly and is displacing PC-centric devices.

 

I think there's still a long way to go before the corporate mobile device market shakes out. What are your biggest concerns about corporate liability of mobile devices? How are you addressing unified communication needs?

 

Also, read more on how corporate IT is shifting in the face of consumer-driven IT. And more from Interop here.

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

1

 


“Blocking social media is old school,” according to one speaker I heard recently at Interop. And what technology leader wants to lag behind the times? The same speaker claimed that information security cannot be assured; only managed. And another session that day touted the benefits of hosting your entire security operations in the cloud. Will security-in-a-box become ‘new school’ and avant garde very soon?

 

 

It’s no surprise that security was a popular topic at the Interop conference in New York a few weeks ago. Yet, the more I learn about IT security risks and solutions, the more of an enigma the issue presents for me. To borrow a recent movie title: It’s Complicated.

 

 

Experts speak as though security is the only nagging concern holding back cloud computing, mobile technologies and social media from simple, ubiquitous implementation. Without those worries, the logic goes, these technologies would be firmly established business platforms by now and unstressed IT executives could spend more time on holiday!

 

 

In fact, breaches are rampant, and how to fast-track risky, emerging technology is the biggest challenge IT faces today. Marcio Salles, a member of Smart Enterprise Exchange, in his blog cites a recent report predicting that U.S. mobile data traffic will exceed 1exabyte by the end of this year! How will you begin to manage and secure that data?

 

Appearing fashionable isn’t enough reason to jeopardize customer trust and intellectual property — even if it reflects “old-school” thinking. Neither can CIOs and security officers be impediments to technology deployments. They are well aware that internal and external customers can move ahead without IT’s blessings as they use Facebook for e-mail, Skype for phone service and Google to host their apps.

 

 

So what is a viable strategy? One speaker recommended that guidelines be put in place to define acceptable risks versus business rewards for each application. Another said that traditional firewalls only work at the perimeter of the business; new efforts have to focus on the broader environment. These generalities sound pretty basic to me and light on specifics.

 

 

How are you approaching the dilemma? Can you be cautious and proactive at the same time? Our recent three-part audiocast with security and privacy officers from Nationwide Insurance, Equifax and Royal Ahold addressed some of the ways they approach risk. Our recent interview with Akamai Technologies' Andy Ellis, sheds light on the topic as well.

 

I also invite Smart Enterprise Exchange members to start a discussion and an interest group around this topic to offer best practices and real-world solutions. Please add your insights and comments here.

 

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange



We encourage your feedback. Reach out via the "Contact the Editor" and "Contact the Concierge" services for any needs, questions or comments. We look forward to serving you!

Paula Klein, Smart Enterprise Exchange Editor
e-mail

Ellen Lalier, Smart Enterprise Exchange Concierge
e-mail
phone 516-562-5727; fax 516-562-5466