Skip navigation
Twitter   Follow us  •   Share   Share    Become a member
1 2 3 4 Previous Next

Editor's Notes

47 Posts
0

As we dive into the New Year, a myriad of IT trends are unfolding — from Amazon’s success with the Kindle Fire, to Facebook’s expected IPO and RIM’s ongoing business challenges — that make it easy to be distracted. But from a macro viewpoint, there are only two key metrics that require your laser focus: keeping pace with technology and staying relevant in your market. Everything else is background noise.

 

That’s not to say you and your staff should ignore the astounding rate at which iPhones and Androids are entering your workplace. And you should clearly be concerned about the recent security breaches affecting 24 million Zappos customers.

 

On a daily basis, however, you — like CIO Larry Bonfante — are probably finding ways to incorporate mobile devices and social media into your enterprise and moving back-end systems to the cloud. At the end of the day, as Larry writes, you aren’t just buying technology, you must answer the question: “What matters to our clients and consumers?” (You can re-read Larry’s Smart Enterprise Exchange blogs for other tips on IT leadership here.)

 

Nowhere is the customer more of a No. 1 priority than in the retail industry — and that mandate is only growing stronger. At the National Retail Federation’s annual conference in January, several speakers addressed ways that social media, business intelligence and mobile devices will make or break retailers in the coming year — and it’s not just CIOs who are involved in these strategies. DSW’s Harris Mustafa, EVP Supply Chain and Merchandise Planning and Allocation, spoke about smart ways to leverage customer data and mobile technologies, as did several CMOs, brand managers and CTOs. Forrester Vice President and Principal Analyst Sucharita Mulpuru looked back and ahead at key retail IT trends.

 

We want to help you stay focused, too, and are offering expert advice on decision making this month and next on Smart Enterprise Exchange. In addition to Pete DeLisi’s thoughtful comments about decision making in the age of speed, book author and Babson Professor Tom Davenport will provide community members with a preview of his upcoming book, Judgment Calls, next month. Tom and co-author Brook Manville discuss organizations that have successfully tapped the diverse and deep knowledge of their people — often using collaborative technologies — to build an organizational decision-making capability.

 

We also feature an insightful Q&A with Randy Gaboriault, CIO at Christiana Care Health System — another industry sector where IT is making dramatic changes to everyday business. In recognition of this important sector, we've added a Healthcare common interest group to the Smart Enterprise Exchange. Please join it and post discussions, comments and ideas to share with other like-minded IT executives.

 

How is your business staying relevant in its market and using technology for customer satisfaction? Join the conversation and share your wins and thoughts with your peers on the Exchange.

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

As a business executive, every year can be viewed as frantic, stressful and demanding. Add to that mix 2011’s global economic uncertainties, persistent unemployment and heightened pricing pressuring in every industrial sector — and the stress mounts.

 

Yet I believe that IT executives faced greater challenges than most this year, making it possibly the most disruptive one yet. Not only were they dealing with the same external pressures as their peers, but also with unprecedented pressures from within their enterprises. Never before have so many stakeholders, with so many demands, questioned everything they do. Answer correctly and you’re a hero; fall short and you may be out. It clearly wasn’t a year for traditionalists or for holding onto the past. Forget old formulas and fixes; this is a new era of IT — the Era of Now, as Peter Hinssen describes it.

 

As executive coach Dina Lichtman wrote earlier this year, “... businesses have forever changed ... [and] CIOs face a unique challenge in dealing with these massive disruptions.”

 

Seen this before, you say? Not really. When PCs came into the enterprise, they didn’t threaten to displace every corporate app and demand access to corporate assets from the far corners of the world. But that’s what consumerization of IT and mobile devices are doing. Customers have as much say in which social media platform a business chooses as the enterprise architect. When in the past have CIOs been told to sanction “bring your own device” (BYOD) technology and to embrace leaderless leadership?

 

Similarly, when businesses sent back-office processes offshore years ago, it meant job losses and reengineering, but it didn’t cause the upheaval in data centers and among individual business units that cloud computing models seem to be producing. The pent-up demand for services, coupled with resentment against IT’s sluggish responses, are widespread. As former CIO Joe Puglisi acknowledged in his blog, “the breadth and scale of the offerings” are unlike those of the past.

 

How can CIOs even contemplate innovation in this environment? It’s difficult. Even the giants in health care, such as Kaiser Permanente, are still taking relatively small steps to develop fresh IT solutions to age-old problems.

 

At Smart Enterprise Exchange and Smart Enterprise magazine this year we have tried to offer strategies, resources and tactics for IT executives facing these real-world challenges every day. Those who are ahead of the pack, such as the CIOs and IT teams at Sprint Nextel, Volvo and JetBlue, aren’t magicians, nor do they have unlimited resources. They do have lots of flexibility, real desire for change, and good relationships with both top management and the business units they serve. They are taking risks and accepting what CA Technologies CIO Greg Valdez calls the IT leadership challenge to change and adapt. We’ve also offered enterprise architects their own forum to exchange ideas, strategies and tactics in the Smart Architect group.

 

My final suggestion for the year, then, is this: Rest, relax and enjoy the holidays. Recharge and reflect. Then, get ready for more disruption ahead: Consumer driven IT, cloud migration and mobile madness will continue full speed ahead. One tool you’ll have on your side is the Smart Enterprise Exchange community to offer guidance and assistance at the speed of business.

 

Health, peace and joy to all,

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

Over the years, return on investment has been the economic litmus test for most business spending — and IT in particular: For CIOs, a purchase either can show hard-dollar payback or it can’t. ROI was also the bottom line that brought IT under scrutiny of finance departments and auditors.

 

Certainly, the “go, no-go” rules loosened up a bit when productivity, competitive advantage and other “soft-dollar” results were considered. These intangibles were always difficult to measure with standard calculations such as net present value (NPV) or total cost of ownership (TCO), but they remained the exceptions — one-off purchases or solutions for individual departments or users.

 

Today, many old metrics and processes seem to be fading, and exceptions are now the rule. Many believe that with the proliferation of social media, consumer devices and cloud computing, for example, new ways to determine ROI — if such approaches even exist — are needed. And some are even claiming that ROI is not only the wrong metric to use, but that it doesn’t exist in reference to social media. Can this be true? If so, how can sound purchasing decisions be made?

 

We have discussed the economics of cloud and virtualization on Smart Enterprise Exchange in the past. As I wrote previously, “Most conclude that there is no one-size-fits-all ROI calculator that tells you when to go to a cloud model and how much you will save or pay. The most definitive answer about lower costs seems to be that you probably will see savings; but as with warning labels on medicine bottles, results will vary with the situation.”

 

My advice at the time was: “Conduct your typical due diligence by analyzing contracts, negotiating with providers and starting small.” But I am starting to realize that this type of traditional approach just may not work in the more amorphous world of social media.

 

Marcio Salles, who blogs about social media with a Brazilian perspective, recently included a great infographic in his blog on Smart Enterprise Exchange. Provided by MDG Advertising, the graphic addressed the ROI of social media for marketing purposes. In sum, it acknowledges that this is a “contentious” topic and offers several ways to measure effectiveness. Among these: going beyond click counts to include revenue generated, reduced returns, conversion rates, and positive brand mentions or feedback, among others.

 

Still, the company says that many factors such as closing business deals, encouraging new partnerships, quicker information retrieval (which translates to lower costs) and particularly, recruiting new talent, are “intangibles.” Among specific platforms mentioned, Facebook and Twitter were rated highly, and YouTube holds out the most promise. But how can their use be monetized?

 

Dozens of other recent blogs and consultants have raised the issue of social media ROI, too, and lots of discussion has ensued. Sean Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of Copyblogger Media, and Sonia Simone, Chief Marketing Officer, treat the subject in a lighthearted blog here but also raise some good points. Specifically, they conclude that revenue should not be a success factor for social marketing efforts. “The real measurement of return lies in the profits created from your culture of marketing.” Another social media executive offered some alternative metrics here, while a marketing strategist says not to worry about ROI — just move ahead with your plans.

 

But I suspect that marketing has different requirements than IT does. Would CIOs get buy-in for large-scale projects based on this advice? Typically, large global enterprises — especially those in regulated industries or with strict guidelines from their boards — need strong business cases for new investments. Has that mindset changed with social media? Must it change?

 

I believe that the landscape is evolving, but slowly. Uncertain financial returns are still inhibiting social media rollouts, according to many sources, including a recent InSites Consulting research report from the U.K. And even those who last year created social media ROI calculators are going back to the drawing board to make revisions.

 

CIOs can’t afford to stall and haggle over every purchase and every departmental request, and I agree that “calculating the ROI of social networks is not rocket science,” as this blog states. Nevertheless, sound decisions are key to good leadership and investment decisions should be based on more than popular trends or gut feelings. That’s the point of view Peter DeLisi takes in an upcoming new blog on Smart Enterprise Exchange next month.

 

Let’s keep this conversation going. What are your experiences in this rapidly changing market sector? Are your corporate purchasing requirements keeping pace with new media? Are RFPs and ROI finally a thing of the past?

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

 

 

Additional resources/ related blogs:

 

1

What’s up with cloud computing? It’s been more than a year since major service providers — Amazon, Microsoft and Google — joined dozens of software companies to offer hosted services for business applications, infrastructure and development platforms. The buzz has been continuous and loud.

 

Many pundits told us that large, risk-averse businesses were leaning toward private clouds — where they hosted apps themselves for internal customers — versus public clouds. In his recent blog, for instance, Ted Ritter wrote that the Nemertes Research 2011/12 enterprise IT benchmark study found “very high interest in private clouds. In fact, 35 percent of the 240 organizations participating in the benchmark will have a private cloud within the next two years.”

 

And as far back as last year, blogger Robin Bloor wrote: “It’s difficult for a CIO today not to be considering a cloud-related strategy. Over the past three years, these hosted services have acquired marketing sparkle, and every IT vendor worth its socks has developed offerings.”

 

Ravi Rajagopal, Vice President, Cloud Strategy, CA Technologies, also wrote that “74 percent of enterprises have deployed a cloud service and have allocated up to 30 percent in cloud spending, and about 70 percent of enterprises are investing in building private clouds,” based on an Avanade 2011 Cloud Global Survey.

 

The verdict on cloud adoption sounds pretty clear, right? Well, maybe not. Just last month at the Interop New York conference, Lauren Nelson, Researcher at Forrester Research, said that very few organizations have actually implemented internal private cloud environments.

 

Nelson said that just 6 percent of those surveyed had internal private clouds in place in early 2011. And at another session I attended, Great Debate: We Will Always Have Private Clouds, industry analysts avidly debated the merits and the future of private clouds. One team's job was to persuade you that we'll always have on-premises private clouds, and the other's job was to argue that we'll eventually move to a utility model where you never touch your servers.[More on this session to follow].

 

Even this far along the adoption curve, then, it seems as if we’re running into definitional differences over what constitutes a private cloud. Forrester says it should have characteristics such as automated deployment and management, self-service access, shared architecture between business units, and pay-per-use billing.

 

Ritter noted that “When analysts talk about private clouds, we assume everyone is on the same page: A cloud is a metered, multitenant, accessible, elastic and self-provisioned service offering.” While most enterprise IT professionals agree with these characteristics, he says they also resist automated self-provisioning.

 

Perhaps, that’s why Timothy Chou, an early cloud advocate, chooses to describe cloud services as data center, compute and store, application and platform services rather than public versus private cloud in his primer here. And Andrew McAfee, author and digital business professor at MIT, in the current issue of Harvard Business Review offers an insightful blog about what CEOs need to know about the cloud here, with lots of perceptive comments noted by readers. Perhaps the fine-tuning is a sign that the market is maturing.

 

How is your business approaching cloud services? Our current poll on Smart Enterprise Exchange so far indicates more enterprises using cloud than not—but many are still in the early stages. Perhaps CA Technology VP George Watt’s assessment is most accurate when he says: “Cloud computing is like a band that took 20 years to become an overnight success.”

 

We will be offering additional insights and thought leadership regarding private, public and hybrid clouds in the next few months. Meanwhile, please take the poll and add your vote as well as your comments to this ongoing discussion.

 

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

Tablets are immature when it comes to enterprise-level management, security and functionality, according to Paul DeBeasi, Research VP, Gartner.  At best, “tablets will augment, not replace, notebooks,” since tablets are “optimized for consumers of content, not creators of content,” he said at the recent New York Interop conference.

 

Chris Hazelton, Research Director, Mobile & Wireless at the 451 Group and ChangeWave Research, meanwhile, countered with August data showing that 16 percent of 1,618 corporations were providing tablets to employees — up from 4 percent in May 2010. In a market where IT spending is flat, that’s a significant amount, he said.

 

The debate over enterprise support of tablets and mobile devices continued on October 5, when the analysts squared off on the topic of whether your next notebook will be a tablet.

 

DeBeasi agreed that tablets are exciting and growing, and Gartner estimates that 300 million will be shipped by 2015. But tablet growth won’t be primarily in enterprises. The new paradigm, he said, will be a multidevice work model where users will select “the best device (smartphone, tablet, notebook) for the job.” The more important question is: “How do we synchronize our content and context among all of our devices?

 

Additionally, DeBeasi said that technology is changing so rapidly that the endpoint devices of today, including tablets, phones and notebooks, won’t be the same in the future. “They are all morphing,” he said.

 

Hazelton agreed that the “form factors” may change, yet mobile apps are on the rise. At present, most business users employ tablets for checking email (70%), accessing the Internet (70%) and working away from the office (68%), but such uses as customer presentations (44%), sales support (43%) and tablets as replacements for laptops (36%), are gaining speed. Perhaps even more significantly, more than half of 505 businesses surveyed by ChangeWave in March said they will deploy two or more mobile apps in 2011.

 

While the debate attracted advocates on each side, to my mind, it’s not an either/or question-- each device will have a user base and each is optimal for a given application. Until device nirvana is reached—whatever form that may take-- the larger issue for enterprise IT is how to get through the interim period when multiple devices need support, service and funding. No one disagrees that short term management will be a challenge.

 

 

Read more about mobile device sessions at Interop here and more about Mobile-driven businesses here.

0

Once tablets and smartphones rule the corporate environment, who will be liable for mobile device support — users or the business? More importantly, how many devices can any single user realistically own and use? Will unified communications (UC) become more urgent?

 

These questions and others were raised and debated at the recent Interop conference in New York. Now that the proliferation of consumer devices is a given, what will the mobile future look like at global enterprises?

 

I found some interesting answers and insights at an analyst roundtable led by Rohit Mehra, Director of Enterprise Communications Infrastructure at IDC. He predicted that the BYOD (bring your own device) trend will persist, yet he expects corporate-supplied mobile devices to increase as well. By 2015, IDC forecasts a nearly even split between smartphones supported by the business (45.3%) and those that users will be expected to maintain on their own (54.7%).

 

As tablets gain legitimacy in the enterprise, the bond between mobile and UC will grow tighter, he said. “Finally, mobile UC will take off,” he said, but while the IEEE 802.11 has become a de facto industry standard for wireless LANs and Wi-Fi, newer standards may emerge making interoperability difficult.

 

Five Devices per Person?

Then there are the challenges posed by the sheer number of devices. IDC expects that people will use as many as five mobile devices of all types, depending on their situation, location and the workload. It’s a number that illustrates the convergence of business and personal life, said Mark Lowenstein, Managing Director, Mobile Ecosystem. Lowenstein said that the desire of mobile users for constant connectivity and low pricing, however, “doesn’t jibe yet” with current cloud models and architectures. By his estimates, 15 to 20 percent of mobile devices are currently enterprise-liable.

 

On the app side of the equation, Bob Egan, VP Mobile Strategy and Chief Analyst, Mobiquity, cited a new Egan/Dresner Mobile BI Study that shows “seismic shifts” in how consumers will acquire their mobile business apps in the next few years. Specifically, he suggested that enterprises will increasingly offer apps themselves, as will mobile operators, as opposed to users getting them from third parties and app stores. Longer term, the apps will be available on the cloud.

 

IT Keeps Some Control

What’s really happening, in Egan’s view, is what he calls the “IT-ization of the workforce.” This means that IT will continue to determine which apps employees are allowed and individual industries will provide governance, lifecycle management and even apps. IT executives may be heartened by his belief that “BYOD won’t take over enterprise,” especially in highly regulated industries where governance and risk play a big role.

 

Meanwhile, Andrew Borg, Senior Research Analyst, Wireless and Mobility, at Aberdeen Group, noted a widespread confluence taking place among social media, mobile apps and the cloud.

 

Among other key points discussed were:

 

  • Most believe that the future of RIM’s BlackBerry is weak at best (and this was before the recent RIM outages!) Mehra thinks it will be around for a while longer, based on its installed base.

 

  • Lowenstein noted that Apple is clearly gaining serious ground at RIM’s expense in the enterprise, and he expects some consolidation of the market to take place in the next year. Borg said that Microsoft should not be discounted in either the smartphone or the tablet market.

 

  • Security and authentication will continue to be the biggest challenge for mobile enterprises. That is where users will want to defer to corporate IT, and IT will want to leverage existing systems. Many different pricing and service plans will be tried, including site licensing for corporate apps, and even pushing the cost of regulatory compliance and security back to employees. Overall, mobile spending is rising quickly and is displacing PC-centric devices.

 

I think there's still a long way to go before the corporate mobile device market shakes out. What are your biggest concerns about corporate liability of mobile devices? How are you addressing unified communication needs?

 

Also, read more on how corporate IT is shifting in the face of consumer-driven IT. And more from Interop here.

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

Agility — like innovation, productivity and cost-savings — is a must-have at businesses today. If you’re not agile, you’ll succumb to the competition. End of story.         

 

But achieving agility is an ongoing story, and tactics vary company to company and task to task. Although I dislike the overused word “enabler,” IT definitely enables business agility and even has a starring role to play. At the same time, agility itself enables a business to reach its end goals — faster transactions, better productivity and lower costs. Agility results when business operates more efficiently, and therefore, there is no single solution — whether it’s cloud or virtualization or consumer devices — to attain it in an instant. Agility doesn’t come in a box or over the Web; it’s a combination of approaches measured in many ways.

 

Many business experts offer theories and examples of how to become an agile business. Mark W.S. Chun, Director of the  Center for Applied Research  and Associate Professor of Information Systems at the Graziadio School of Business and Management at  Pepperdine University in Los Angeles, told me recently that his latest research indicates that, contrary to many beliefs, public-sector IT efforts — particularly in Asia — are often more innovative and agile than those in the private-sector. While lower funding and transient management teams are usually business inhibitors, Chun says that when you’re small and scrappy, you take risks and adopt new ideas quickly — before the next administration, budget cuts or political shift occurs. That may be why mobile technologies and cloud services are being widely embraced by governments and their agencies, he says.

 

Smart Enterprise magazine will be examining “IT at the Speed of Business” in the latest issue. It includes a profile of Josh Morton, Sprint’s VP of IT Enterprise Services, who must empower its dispersed enterprise to respond faster and with greater agility than ever before. A major re-platforming of the IT infrastructure and a new mobile strategy are under way to meet demands.

 

At Avis Europe, reexamination of its business processes was a first step toward making effective use of resources and reducing costs to become more agile. Avis deployed CA Clarity™ Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) to manage risk and for visibility of IT service and resource costs.

 

In the best cases, agility is simply a way of doing business — and it starts at the top level of the organization. In this interview in the MIT Sloan Review, Christian Rynning-Tønnesen, CEO of Statkraft, says: “The ability to create strategies and adapt to changing conditions quickly is critical for maintaining a competitive edge.” Rather than slowing down the company with regulations, costs and overhead, Statkraft is pursuing sustainability to keep it ahead of competitors and its marketplace. “In just two decades Statkraft has grown from a state-owned, Norwegian-focused power supplier to one of the world’s largest renewable power producers,” according to the article.

 

Look for more articles and blogs about IT-driven agility — including outsourcing trends and the role of Enterprise Architects in making businesses more nimble — in the coming month on Smart Enterprise Exchange. Then let us know some of the ways your IT department is moving rapidly to meet business needs.

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

1

 

Like you, I’ve learned a lot about leadership over the years. Why then does it still seem counterintuitive — and maybe a little uncomfortable — to read that we can achieve better results without a top-down, command-and-control strategy? I thought about this as I read Charlene Li’s insightful blog post this week.

 

Many years ago, as a newly appointed manager with more than a dozen direct reports — some of them in remote bureaus — I was super-diligent about staying in touch, tracking performance and staying on top of the work.

 

In my defense, we didn’t have IM or tweets or smartphones to connect us, and I thought my primary job was to be hands-on and to keep the momentum going. I also worked hard and thought that if I led by example, the rest would follow.

 

The results were mixed. We produced great products to the highest standards, but people got burnt out, including me. We weren’t enjoying the work as much as we could have, and there was a “creative tension” most of the time. Of course, the corporate culture promoted and encouraged this approach, and I was merely carrying out orders. But in fact, they weren’t the right orders for people who were already motivated, creative and talented.

 

Charlene’s advocacy of open leadership may have helped somewhat, but without the technology and the urgency that’s present at most enterprises today — what Peter Hinssen in his animated video calls The Era of Now — there would probably still be a disconnect between executives and workers.

 

Many thought leaders — such as Don Tapscott — have promoted transparency over the years, and the archives (and business schools) are full of books, courses and white papers that espouse formulas and theories about effective team management.

 

What’s really different right now, however, is IT. Social media really does change everything. Because it’s disruptive, old lessons don’t apply; yet new solutions—even among younger managers-- are still evolving. What does management look like when collaboration is a mantra, crowdsourcing is acceptable and customers have their say? Where do CIOs fit in when, as Alistair Croll wrote last year, the democratization of IT and the enterprise are the direct result of consumer technologies? How do you get out of the way and still be an effective leader? Do we need new strategies or new leaders?

 

 

Smart Enterprise Exchange is continuing to offer many perspectives about social media and leadership to help you answer these questions and adapt to the rapid-fire pace of change. Nathan Clevenger, author of the recent book, iPad in the Enterprise, offers four concrete steps you can take to adopt a mobile strategy. When I spoke to Nathan recently, he suggested many practical tips based on his interviews with global CIOs for the book. As you would expect, the first step is to accept, rather than resist, the notion of shared leadership — exactly what consumer technologies support.

 

Executive coach Dina Lichtman also addresses this topic in a recent blog and in an upcoming one where she asked Elizabeth Osder for her perspective on social media’s organizational impact.

 

Apparently, there’s still a lot to learn about leadership. And while you may not find a one-size-fits-all solution, as IT executives leading teams of technologists, business partners and social media-savvy customers, you must leave your comfort zone, try out the options and see what works best (then, share your experiences on the Exchange). The stakes couldn’t be higher, and there’s no time to waste.

 

 

Paula  Klein

 

Editor and Community Manager

 

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

 

What do recent hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados and other catastrophes around the world have to do with your role as a CIO? Plenty, when it comes to the traditional task of “keeping the lights on” 24/7. Many still consider the business continuity and disaster recovery aspects of IT as the most basic: Keep servers up and running; commission backup sites for emergencies, and replicate everything. That’s still sound advice, but in an age of cloud computing, virtualization, mobile devices and consumer driven IT, the basics are anything but basic.

 

In the past, when a disaster occurred, business was at a standstill until backup kicked in. Now, as wireless voice and data networks become more reliable, employees are ready to work remotely from their tablets, smartphones and other mobile devices — but only if the email server, VPN and other critical systems are up and access is available.

 

For example, many people who lost electricity this past week during the hurricane that hit the eastern U.S. were able to stay online via email and social networks and thanks to battery-powered mobile devices, Internet cafes and local libraries. That put extra pressure on IT departments to do their part: ensure that central servers were up and running so that business could continue. Thanks to backup and e-trading, the New York Stock Exchange opened as usual after the storm, and many in the financial industry — although they were unable to go to their offices — used Web access and Wi-Fi near home to participate in the trading day.

 

It’s clear that the business losses that result without adequate protection are huge. Based on a survey sponsored late last year by CA Technologies, the average global organization annually loses 545 person hours as a result of IT downtime. The survey, of 2,000 North American and European organizations conducted by Coleman Parkes Research firm, also found that “IT outages are frequent and lengthy — substantially damaging companies’ reputations, staff morale and customer loyalty. Despite this, 56 percent of organizations in North America and 30 percent in Europe don’t have a formal and comprehensive disaster recovery policy.”

 

A Smart Enterprise Exchange article last year also reported that a startlingly low percentage of businesses are actually adopting virtual backup despite the benefits in business continuity/disaster recovery initiatives.

 

What are some other options? As we reported, businesses are increasingly considering cloud options to help get data back online when disaster strikes. Several new products and services aimed at the need for virtual backup were introduced this week at VMWorld.

 

Of course some traditional advice still applies — with an updated twist. For instance, make sure you have remote access to your entire business — phones, services and email — even if you use a cloud provider. And be sure that your files, videoconferencing and all other databases and services are completely, and securely, accessible from a computer with a Web browser.

 

Mother Nature will continue to have her way, so backup protection is critical. When your mobile workforce logs on, will the enterprise be ready? Share your storm stories with your peers on the Exchange.

 

 

 

Paula  Klein

 

Editor and Community Manager

1

 

We all get so immersed in our busy professional lives that we often forget to reflect on the big picture and human side of information technology and its role in global society. I was reminded of this when I recently spoke with Jiten Patel, whom I had the pleasure of working with when he was CIO at the microfinance organization, FINCA.

 

Like you, Jiten works in IT-driven organizations and deals with the complexities of delivering secure consumer technologies and cloud computing services to internal and external stakeholders. In particular, his lens is open to the worldwide view — especially, developing nations. In his current role as CEO of MicroPlanet Technologies, Jiten provides cloud services to microfinance institutions that, in turn, make microloans in Latin America, Asia and Africa.

 

For some of us, it’s difficult to connect the dots between high-technology platforms such as cloud computing and the poverty, lack of infrastructure and instability that many of the world’s populations face. We frequently hear about the boom in cell phone use in developing nations and the growth of high-tech industries such as call centers, often outsourced from U.S. businesses. But the realities of unreliable electricity, lack of Internet connectivity and insufficient skills are far more common. As Jiten writes in his blog on Smart Enterprise Exchange this month, information and communication technology (ICT) holds out promise and opportunities for these nations despite huge challenges. I encourage you to comment on his blog and to get involved as you can. You can also join a group on this site to discuss issues with your peers in London, India or Mexico Or on the topics of cloud computing, green IT or Web 2.0.

 

 

 

All you need to do is scan the headlines to see stories about ICT’s role in economic growth in countries from South   Africa to Kenya; Brazil to the Philippines. Brazil this month announced that it is offering 75,000 scholarships for secondary students to study science and engineering — fields that lag significantly behind the study of humanities. Right now, Brazil has a shortage of qualified applicants for the high-tech industries that are growing most quickly. This contrasts with other fast-developing nations, such as India and the Philippines, where graduate choices are heavily skewed toward computing, science and engineering.

 

If you’d like a more academic explanation of global economics, several upcoming new business books may provide helpful background and food for thought. The basic principle of Western capitalism is the subject of two upcoming business books — each with a different conclusion. Based on previews of the book Capitalism at Risk: Rethinking the Role of Business, co-authors and Harvard Business School professors Joseph Bower, Herman Leonard and Lynn Paine, argue that while governments must play a role, businesses should take the lead in sustaining market capitalism. Due out in October, the book explains how business “must serve both as innovator and activist, developing corporate strategies that effect change at the community, national and international levels.”

 

By contrast, Standing on the Sun: How the Explosion of Capitalism Abroad Will Change Business Everywhere, due out next February, contends that new economic models will unfold as the emerging economies of the world — primarily, Brazil, India, China and others — surge forward. The co-authors, Christopher Meyer and Julia Kirby, ask: “As these fast-growing, low-income economies mature, will they adopt the practices of the old guard or will they make their own way, and create the next prevailing version of capitalism?”

 

Finally, in India Inside: The Emerging Innovation Challenge to the West, due out in November, leading management experts Nirmalya Kumar and Phanish Puranam describe the quiet, but dramatic rise in innovation occurring in India — from B2B products and R&D outsourcing to process and management innovation. The authors maintain that “for certain kinds of innovation, the long-held monopoly of the developed world is over.”

 

So, as some of you wind down the last days of summer holidays, or perhaps as you travel the globe, observe the rise of technology and weigh its implications for future economies. Then consider: What role will you and your enterprise play on this global stage?

 

 

Paula  Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

 

While highly publicized consumer technologies are top of mind for most CIOs, there are several other critical trends — many of them directly related to mobile and consumer technologies, but not as glitzy — that they must grapple with concurrently.

 

Chief among these nitty-gritty IT concerns is the nearly out-of-control proliferation of data. This is the result of the huge amounts of information created in cyberspace. As writer Bob Violino tells us in his feature article this month, data centers have always dealt with big amounts of data but now, it’s not uncommon for organizations of all types — not just scientific, number-crunching businesses such as Geostellar — to handle massive petabytes of digital data created on tiny smartphones and tablet computers.

 

“Clearly,” he notes, “this data blast is on the minds of IT executives.” Dick Csaplar, Senior Research Analyst at Aberdeen Group, says that “managing the explosion of data is usually cited as the No. 1 pressure” among his clients.

 

Geostellar has two separate infrastructures — an internal infrastructure with powerful, dedicated servers, and a public cloud-based environment — for managing its computational information. But it’s much tougher for smaller, less-sophisticated enterprises to keep pace.

 

The Missouri State Highway Patrol in Jefferson   City, Mo., for instance, has seen data volume triple in the past decade, from less than one terabyte to nearly 30 terabytes today. Much of this has come from electronic media such as digital video, audio and photos, according to CIO Clifford Gronauer. And with municipal dollars in short supply, it’s not easy to justify the spending.

 

This trickle-down may be what Andi Mann, VP of Strategic Solutions at CA Technologies, meant when he told Smart Enterprise Exchange recently that enterprises are not prepared for the fallout from consumer technologies and the “fundamental change” that they are causing. Infrastructure issues — from standardization, to security, to desktops — need new management strategies and governance, he says.

 

While there are tremendous opportunities for bold leadership and innovation, adoption of consumer IT in the enterprise will be “a hard transition,” Mann says. Many old ways just won’t work any more, and new spending may be required as well.

 

Data center staffing also reflects the uncertainty that’s afoot. In his blog about IT employment trends, John Longwell, VP at Computer Economics, says that although data center functions largely seem to have survived the worst of the global recession, “it may be too early to see the full impact of current data center technology shifts on IT employment.” Cloud and SaaS models may mean fewer data centers but more jobs for managers and support personnel, according to his current research. What new positions is your IT department seeking and which are on hold?

 

Look for more coverage about consumer-driven IT in August as well as commentary on big data trends. You can also read Andi Mann’s blog on consumerization here. As always, share your experiences with your peers on the Exchange.

 

 

Paula Klein

 

Editor and Community Manager

 

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

 

Innovation. Everyone wants it; few achieve it — or at least not easily. That’s a fact I was considering recently when I interviewed Faye Sahai, Executive Director of Innovation and Advanced Technology at Kaiser Permanente, on the topic of “Seeding Innovation.”

 

Fostering innovation-- a topic we have discussed previously in a blog and another here -- is gaining new urgency. Scan the news these days and you’ll see summer camps, professional organizations, governments, and of course businesses in every industry and country, offering awards, incentives, contests and funds for new ideas. They all seem to know that without innovative approaches and fresh ideas, the economy will stagnate and progress will stall. Why, then, is it still so tough to really execute on these goals?

 

One reason, alluded to by Google’s CEO Larry Page last week, is that you have take risks. In response to questions about the company’s innovation model, he was quoted as saying: “When we started doing search, people thought we were crazy.” Clearly, that risk has paid off.

 

Another big innovation inhibitor is funding. Even Google’s Page and other executives — never mind those lower down in the organization — have to defend some seemingly “crazy” investments to nervous boards and investors who don’t see innovation for its own sake as a good business model.

 

Additionally, many experts say that in order to succeed, you have to expect some failures along the way — and that’s not always easy to accept. In fact, at many organizations, corporate culture can become a barrier that restrains innovation. Unless everyone is in sync — and makes innovation part of the way the enterprise operates — it will be tough to pull off.

 

These are all points that Sahai addressed during our interview. Kaiser — one of the nation’s largest not-for-profit health plans with $424.2 billion in 2010 revenue and more than 8.6 million members — seems to have conquered these innovation obstacles, and a long list of awards and accolades demonstrates that it’s on the right track.

 

It certainly helps that Chairman and CEO George Halvorson is on board, as is the CIO, Phil Fasano. But even with buy-in, innovation could get stalled in the discussion phase without someone like Sahai and her team driving it forward every day.

 

As she told me, “Innovation is in the company’s DNA; it’s part of our root and core.” To some, Sahai may have a dream job, with access to internal and external partners and the weight of Kaiser’s Garfield Innovation Center at her disposal. But her own diverse background in both IT and business has helped her to champion ideas and inspire others while aligning with the business every step of the way.

 

With healthcare reform and competitive pressures, she knows that there’s a lot riding on leapfrogging others with new robotics, e-health and predictive analytics, as well as fast delivery of member services. At the same time, she needs the support of the doctors, nurses and providers who are often more concerned about high touch than high tech.

 

Her tactics are to collaborate closely with IT to “operationalize” innovation rather than keeping it in silos. For instance, she uses an internal social media platform to share ideas and expertise among employees “so it bubbles up” through the organization. Additionally, HR rewards idea-generation as part of employee performance reviews. It takes “technology, people and funding,” to put ideas into action, she says.

 

Sahai makes it seem easy to seed innovation — and maybe it is. Her advice? Open the environment to employees and partners; identify a leader and a strategy and fund the efforts, and encourage sharing of both successes and failures.

 

Hey, it’s worth a try …

 

You can find more data on IT innovation in this article on Smart Enterprise Exchange. For more details on Kaiser’s efforts, read the current issue of Smart Enterprise magazine. Also, listen to the full podcast with Faye Sahai and let me know your thoughts.

 

 

 

Paula Klein

 

Editor and Community Manager

 

Smart Enterprise Exchange

1

 

CIOs have faced criticism in the last year or so for not embracing social media, consumer IT and cloud platforms in their enterprises. Many experts — some quoted on Smart Enterprise Exchange, in fact — were quick to say that CIOs must adapt more rapidly to the demands of their business users, partners and consumers.

 

Well, that seems to be changing. While challenges remain, the days of the "CI-No" are waning, based on the results of a new research report published by IDC and CA Technologies.

 

The white paper, titled, “IT Consumers Transform the Enterprise: Are You Ready?” finds that: “Consumer adoption of the cloud is here, with cloud-based applications and social networking becoming the norm.” Specifically, 19 percent of those whom IDC defines as worldwide leaders are improving agility, gaining competitive advantage and seeing benefits by scaling up consumer technologies.

 

Figure 7 - signature2297CB.jpg


Follow the Leaders

IDC defines “leaders” as IT organizations that are self-reportedly proactive in their adoption of public cloud, mobile and social technologies. Fully two-thirds (66 percent) of respondents are well on their way to integrating these technologies into their IT strategy, according to the research. Where does that leave the CIO?

 

According to Crawford Del Prete, IDC's Chief Research Officer: "Today's CIOs have an opportunity to lead both business and IT innovation as they help their organizations decide how to best exploit the trend toward consumerization and personalization of IT."

 

Although 15 percent of respondents said that consumer technology is brought into the enterprise with no IT involvement, Del Prete sees opportunities for CIOs “to work closely with business decision makers to create safe, secure, well-managed environments that allow the company to communicate and collaborate with customers and employees anytime, anywhere.”

 

It’s still IT’s job to “lead the charge in order to ensure that customers are engaged, confidential data is protected, employee productivity is enabled, and the enterprise is getting the greatest return possible on every IT dollar it spends," he says.

 

The report concludes that we are currently at a “tipping point” where mainstream organizations will continue to aggressively embrace the adoption of consumerized technologies for the enterprise, and others must make their move.

 

Of course, the study notes both opportunities and challenges for IT departments and “CIOs will continue to face tremendous pressure to satisfy the growing demand for data and services from business users within their organizations”, said Dave Hansen, General Manager, CA Technologies. Yet, they are already responding by offering new services and collaborating with stakeholders, he said.

 

IDC surveyed 804 IT executives from organizations of more than $1 billion in revenue, and separately surveyed 1,040 IT consumers who use the public cloud, smart mobile devices, and/or social networks for personal or business purposes. Taken together, the reports shed light on the state of consumer-driven IT in several ways. Key among these:

 

  • Leaders conduct more interactions with their customers via smart mobile devices (41% compared with 28% of mainstream organizations).
  • Leaders are more proactive when it comes to social media. They are more likely to use social networks to capture detailed insights about their customers (44% compared with 24% of mainstream organizations) and are more concerned about providing a consistent user experience to customers via social networks across all devices or browsers.
  • Leaders’ use of cloud services outpaces that of their mainstream counterparts. Thirty-four percent use Platform as a Service (PaaS), 32 percent use Software as a Service, and 27 percent use Infrastructure as a Service.
  • Leaders’ use of interactive technologies such as video, Skype and chat is increasing.
  • Leaders are more concerned about their ability to guarantee an end-to-end user experience via mobile devices (41%, compared with 27% of the mainstream organizations).
  • Leaders use public or private cloud to provide remote personal productivity

 

Want more information? Read our feature article on collaborative tools and Navigating the Social Business. Interestingly, we found that many times IT and CIOs — even at large organizations such as AARP and JetBlue — are supporting social media strategies that are initiated and managed by other business units or social media “owners.”

 

Where does your business lie on this spectrum? Does IT lead social media or support the initiatives of business units and stakeholders? Share your experiences on the Exchange.

 

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

2

 

Will your business lower costs by using cloud services? That seems to be a key bottom-line question that CIOs — and their bosses — want to know. Why then is it so hard to get a simple answer?

 

Writer Doug Bartholomew reports in his article, Costing out the Cloud, that, “understanding cloud economics is sort of like going for a swim in a hidden lake” — you never know the depth before you take the plunge.

 

While that sounded true, I was left wondering why. How can a model designed to ease complexity be so complicated to price out — especially when nearly every department from HR to sales is jumping into the cloud computing pool?

 

When I investigated further, I found lots of research, analyses and case studies that I will share with you here. Most concluded that there is no one-size-fits-all ROI calculator that tells you when to go to a cloud model and how much you will save or pay; the most definitive answer about lower costs seems to be you probably will see savings; but as with warning labels on medicine bottles, results will vary with the situation.

 

Cost savings may be one of the prime reasons companies are flocking to the cloud, but as Steve Phillips, VP and CIO at Avnet, told us: It is “only part of the story. At Avnet, it’s more about adding new functionality more quickly and affordably than we could do it on our own,” he says.

 

Some analysts are comparing cloud economics to the outsourcing of a decade ago. In an Accenture report, “Cloud and the Future of Business: From Costs to Innovation,” issued earlier this year, the consultancy — which also provides IT outsourcing services — says that shifting computing and storage capabilities into the cloud offers economies of scale in terms of IT support, energy consumption and speed.

 

However, it also says that cloud computing is unlikely to result in huge transformational shifts “if it is understood solely in terms of cost savings arising from data centre consolidation and virtualization.” Indeed, just as business found that “the most effective forms of long-term outsourcing tend to have a perspective that is diametrically opposed to concerns about cost-minimization,” cloud computing has to be considered from a broad perspective as well.

 

Accenture’s conclusion? “Long-term cost benefit modeling for cloud computing is immature and demands much further attention.” So that puts you back where you started from.

 

James Staten, VP and Principal Analyst at Forrester, has also studied cloud economics, and asks in a recent blog: “Is your cloud strategy centered on saving money or fueling revenue growth?” Where you land on this question, he says, “could determine a lot about your experience level with cloud services and what guidance you should be giving to your application developers and infrastructure and operations teams.”

 

According to Staten, “the majority of CIOs would vote for the savings, seeing cloud computing as an evolution of outsourcing and hosting that can drive down capital and operations expenses. In some cases this is correct, but in many the opposite will result. Using the cloud wrong may raise your costs.”

 

Staten offers other insights in another blog about which applications to move to the cloud. He advises that: “For enterprises to make the most of a public cloud platform, they need to ensure that their applications match the economic model presented by public clouds. Otherwise, the cloud may actually cost you more.”

 

I also recommend reading a comprehensive white paper, “The Economics of the Cloud,” issued late last year by Microsoft. It offers models and criteria to use as a framework when making decisions about cloud economics. It is a very in-depth analysis of cloud cost considerations and includes discussion of infrastructure, data center and utilization; multi-tenancy options; support and maintenance costs; capital versus operational budget expenditures; private versus public cloud costs, and new application development costs.

 

It also notes that the emergence of cloud services is different from previous outsourcing and virtualization efforts and is “fundamentally shifting the economics of IT … cloud architectures facilitate elastic consumption, self-service, and pay-as-you-go pricing.”

 

 

The report cites four areas that may yield economies of scale and cost savings:

 

  • Cost of electrical power

 

  • Infrastructure labor cost

 

  • Buying power

 

  • Elimination of capital expenditure

 

So, what are the takeaways for budget-conscious CIOs and their business-unit partners from these experts? In my view, it’s to jump in and test the waters, but carefully. Conduct your typical due diligence by analyzing contracts, negotiating with providers and starting small. Know what type of cloud is optimal for each applications before you sign on. Are you looking at pay-as-you-go public clouds to offload peak capacity from your servers, or for a small, dedicated application hosted in a private cloud for one business group? The total cost of ownership (TCO) will be very different for each.

 

I’d like to know more about how you approach cloud economics at your enterprise. Does the pace of business allow for thorough cost analysis for each application? Are you saving money? Please share your experience and tactics by commenting on this blog and also take our poll here to compare your strategies with your peers.

 

 

Paula Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

0

I love the Dilbert comic strips because they point out the humorous side of our daily business lives. They can be biting at times, and certainly they exaggerate enormously, but like a lot of humor they are funny because they often ring true.

 

IT has received its fair share of attention from Scott Adams, the creator of the strip, over the years and that seems to be stepping up recently as the disruption accelerates. In just the past week or two, for example, Dilbert’s world has poked fun at IT monitoring employee Web sites, the proliferation of passwords, and inattentive tech support. It’s good to laugh at these caricatures sometimes and see the light side of the bureaucracies we inadvertently create. At the same time, we should be careful that life doesn’t imitate art in this case — and that IT is solving business problems, not creating new ones.

 

Oddly, perhaps, I thought of Dilbert when I read a recent white paper published by Accenture’s prestigious Institute for High Performance, which raised a very serious question: Can Enterprise IT Survive the Meteor of Consumer Technology?

 

It’s an excellent position paper that lays forth several premises about the consumerization of IT — something we have all heard about and are experiencing daily. Fundamentally, Accenture says: “As consumer technologies become ever more powerful and useful, IT leaders face difficult questions about how to adapt. While definitive answers are elusive for now, they must be grappled with today if enterprise IT is not to be pushed completely to the sidelines in the next few years.”

 

I would include cloud computing along with the consumer technologies that line of businesses are adopting on their own, often circumventing traditional IT purchasing processes.

 

Accenture is not alone in considering these issues, of course. In a report late last year, McKinsey also concluded that “fully networked enterprises are not only more likely to be market leaders or to be gaining market share, but [they] also use management practices that lead to margins higher than those of companies using the Web in more limited ways.” Smart Enterprise Exchange has featured companies that are implementing these practices, as well, such as Procter & Gamble’s e-commerce efforts, and Schumacher Group’s dive into mobile technologies this year.

 

Yet Accenture’s paper seems most significant to me because it focuses on the CIO and the IT department transformation that’s taking place. Its analysts pose very provocative and direct questions when they ask: “Is it inevitable that IT will become irrelevant over time? For that matter, is it possible that the CIO has already lost the control he was fighting so hard to keep?”

 

Smart Enterprise magazine and the Smart Enterprise Exchange community will be taking an in-depth look at these critical IT issues in the coming months. Specifically, how are collaborative and consumer platforms disrupting business and repositioning IT in the enterprise, and how can CIOs get ahead of the curve?

 

We will speak with CIOs at businesses such as Kaiser Permanente, CorePLUS and JetBlue Airways who are not only embracing consumer technologies in their global enterprises, but are finding ways to use them for competitive advantage, revenue-generation and customer satisfaction — exactly the IT topics that Dilbert and others have criticized in the past. Perhaps it is by seizing the opportunities new platforms represent that IT will not only maintain its relevance, but grow even more important to the enterprise.

 

In addition, we’ll highlight the results of two in-depth, global research studies that CA Technologies conducted with IDC. The first, with more than 1,000 consumer-tech user responses describes “the booming adoption of mobile and online/cloud technologies for personal and business use and consumers’ expectations of much higher usage going forward.” The second, surveyed more than 800 enterprise IT executives to get their perspective and strategies in light of the rapid pace of consumer tech usage. The key recommendations? Offer support and focus on automation, management and security. [See related article here.]

 

We also invite you to help lead our online discussion and offer your experiences, opinions and solutions foryour peers.You can begin by taking this poll and also by leaving a comment on this blog. You can also create a discussion thread on the site’s Web 2.0 in the Enterprise Group or on our Linked In group.

 

 

Paula  Klein

Editor and Community Manager

Smart Enterprise Exchange

1 2 3 4 Previous Next

We encourage your feedback. Reach out via the "Contact the Editor" and "Contact the Concierge" services for any needs, questions or comments. We look forward to serving you!

Paula Klein, Smart Enterprise Exchange Editor
e-mail

Ellen Lalier, Smart Enterprise Exchange Concierge
e-mail
phone 516-562-5727; fax 516-562-5466